| Home | |||
| Products | |||
| Slink-e | |||
| CDJ | |||
| Download | |||
| Support | |||
| Help Library | |||
| FAQ | |||
| Groups | |||
| Technical | |||
| Xantech | |||
| Master/Slave | |||
| Schematic | |||
| Contact Us | |||
| Legal | |||
| | Read Responses | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
|---|
Slink-e / CDJ Discussion Archive #10
Re: Save vs Save All
Posted By: Colby Boles <cboles@n...> In Response To: Re: Save vs Save All (Mike Kropp)
Date: 10/28/00 1:08pm
I've been wanting to do this for a long time, but I'm very hesitant. CDJ does so many things now which involve looking at data from every disc and track that I'm concerned about performance. The comprimise may be to leave the Recordsets open and look from notifications from ADO when the data has changed to know when to update our cached version of the data in memory.
Colby
Responses To This Message
- Re: Save vs Save All - Mike Kropp - 10/28/00 2:30pm
| | Read Responses | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
|---|
Slink-e / CDJ Discussion Archive #10 is maintained by slinke-bbs-owner@nirvis.com with WebBBS 3.21.